Gay Mormons? Mormon Leaders? Good Luck Chuck?
Good Luck Chuck?
Wasn't that movie supposed to be absolutely awful? I never saw it, but it has Dane Cook in it - which is the acting equivalent of adding a teaspoon of urine to a bottle of 1998 Petrus Pomerol merlot - so I don't doubt that the movie was terrible. He sure does piss all over everything, doesn't he? "You know, Gone With the Wind would have been one of the greatest films in the history of humankind - but it had Dane Cook in it. So I walked out towards the middle."
Dane Cook has nothing to do with being gay. Most people also believe that gay people have nothing to do with Mormons. Yet everything comes full circle.
I keep seeing the headline "Gay Mormons Seek Meeting With New Leader" show up in my RSS reader this morning, so after the 4th headline I took the bait - and clicked. While I don't necessarily follow gay Mormon issues the way others do (yawn, yawn and yawn) I'm a rather unsuccessful homosexual as well as formerly attended the Mormon church myself. Thus, I'm curious.
Apparently the group Affirmation recently sent a letter to the LDS Church's newest president, Thomas S. Monson, requesting a meeting. According to the article:
Affirmation, with more than 2,000 gay, lesbian and transgender members, is not recognized by the church, which at one time labeled homosexuality as a problem that required help."Although there are many areas of hurt and disagreement that have separated us, there are many more areas on which we can find agreement, and in doing so, become a blessing in the lives of many of the Saints, both straight and gay," the group wrote in its invitation to Thomas S. Monson last week.
Monson assumed leadership of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints last Sunday following the death of its previous president, Gordon B. Hinckley.
Such a meeting with Monson and his counselors — a triumvirate known as the First Presidency — would be unprecedented, said David W. Melson, the group's assistant executive director.
"This was something we've talked about for a while," Melson said. "With the death of President Hinckley and the installation of new church leadership, it seemed like the appropriate time."
Fascinating. I have very mixed feelings on this. On the one hand, it's encouraging to think that people still associated with the 'Gay Mormon Movement' (I just trademarked that - it's mine now) are hoping to make a positive change within the LDS Church, and that it it appears as though progress is possible. On the other hand though, what do those who no longer have an association with the LDS Church - such as myself - feel about such action?
Years ago, when I was more involved with the 'Gay Mormon Movement' (tm), I would have been encouraged by such prospects. As I've continued to live my life though, and broaden my spiritual understandings, I feel as though I no longer need to define my spirituality by a pre-defined periphery.
While I applaud the steps taken by Affirmation, the other disillusioned and cynical no-longer-Mormon-but-happily-gay members of the gay community - those who feel as I do - can't help but ask: "is it even worth it?" I obviously don't have an answer.
I appreciate the steps taken by others on their quest to find the intersection of sexuality and religion. I on the other hand am perfectly happy spending my afternoon watching Good Luck Chuck.
















Recent Comments